Hello Martin;

I am not trying to interfere with your corporation or your comments. However, it might be best for anyone who works for the UT to not discuss this on the forum. It is better that it be forgotten.

I do thank you for your comments on this issue but there is a great possibility that once the box is opened it will never be closed!

Tom


>Hi, Jay.
>
>>But that's the problem. It shouldn't be kept private. A couple things you said disturb me. Things like sensitive messages, complaints from other members (sic) and discomfort are all very (very, very) subjective. I'm complaining that it was unfair and that doesn't seem to matter. Other's make posts asking for the removal of someone because they are annoyed and nothing is said. In fact my saying that it seems unfair seems to be a bigger problem to UT then the post(s) asking for John's removal.
>
>We keep most of this matter private as most of the inner workings about running our website. This is not something that we the need nor the desire to make public in full detail. Why? Just because it is very long and very sad to state all the problems and the damage caused.
>
>It is a subjective decision? Absolutely. Is it within our righs as administrators of the site (Michel being the owner). Yes, also.
>
>>Nothing personal, but your post is a very politically-correct regurgitation of Michel's opinion.
>
>Highly probable, also. I'm just trying to clarify our corporate opinion on the subject.
>
>Best regards,