>
>Hi,
>
>I believe that buffering can be used in conjunction with transaction processing or you can simply use transaction processing. I do the both thing involving buffered tables and a begin/end transaction. Each has it's own buffered region which must successfully complete to have the data put on the disk. This provides assurances that all data has been updated together. You should read;
>"Where the Data Goes to Hide" by Andy Neil in the Feb 1998 Advisor.
>
>Steve


Thanks for your reply

Later I decided the Fox behavior was appropriate (but underdocumented).

I had read the article but wanted to read it again but couldn't find it. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

Peter