Terry,

It's not that nobody could make it work in .NET ... it's just that nobody bothered to try. I doubt if the "challenge" was directed at me (because I don't think I was participating in that thread at the time, although I've been known to forget things ... early Alzheimer's I think <g>) ... but, personally, I'm too swamped with work and other things outside of work (like moving into a new house) to take the time to mess with RIO ... I think those are good enough excuses, don't you? <g>

~~Bonnie

>It's may look like an accomplishment to you - but it its just a little demo program to most, that, dare I say again - you NET Evangelicals could not make work in .NET! I think the sun was in your eyes, you had a flat tire, mommy didn't make you pan cakes - or you missed the bus - I forget exactly why you couldn't do it - but I won't press the point - that scabs been picked e-nuff!
>
>So how are you comming with the VALID argument in your @GET statements?:-)
>
>
>
>>But the question was, Why bother? RIO has no specific purpose other than an accomplishment for you ....
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Why convert it? You'd have to re-engineer the design.
>>>Then it should be a no-brainer for the Einstien's in PA!
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>You're defending your weenie size again, Truth be known - there are a bunch of developers on this board that could blow you out of the water with one arm tied behind their back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Name 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know what planet you live on, but if you were involved in FOX in the last 10 years, JVP was a driving force. There are few that can match his ability, cognitive skills and contribution to the community.
>>>>>
>>>>>Gosh yo PA evangelicals are taking this mutual admiration society thing to a new high! Hey - He couldn't convert RIO to .NET!:-)