>>>I never asked for him to be banned. The worst I did was start a new thread >>to stop the nonsense surrounding John's post in the VFP forum.
>Sorry if that is what you thought I implied. I don't know who griped. Heck it's their business if they want to grip. It's a free world.
>
>My point was that it seems people that dont like John or his messages always seem to engage him. I think both parties enjoy the engagement. Heck it's more fun here when those types of threads occur.
>
>>>I find it a bit bizarre that my name is the first one you mentioned. I >>don't think that I was the one that was involved the most with him. In >>fact Jim is in second place. Two Canadians... Hmmm do you have something >>against canadians?
>oops... you found me out. I have been coming to canada for the last 3 years to convince you to join the US. Heck we could use the Molson and the cool jet skis made in your town<g>


Well, it looks like you're finally getting Molsons, but I have to wonder if they're going to turn Coors into beer, or turn Molsons into water (not that I have anything against US Beer, you understand). ;)


>>>Then again I also notice that the names are in alphabetical order
>The ILUMINATI made me do it.
>
>>>You see it does'nt take long to bring a thread in a direction that has >>nothing to do with the original idea.
>Yup... See above. We are watching you<g>
>
>What I want to say out of this. Debating is nice. Debating just for the kick of debating or just for pure provocation is'nt worth much. Don't you think that John's last replies looked like it?
>
>>>I wonder if all his threads have been removed yet? And his name perhaps >>replaced by "John Doe" in all the threads where his name was mentioned.
>>>1984? Come on don't you think that you're overreacting?
>
>I'm pretty big on free speech. I dont think what John did was wrong and this is just the beginning of censorship here.
>
>Rodman