Bonnie,

>Jim,
>
>>It is quite clear (now) that someone has to complain about a message first BEFORE any form of review/judgement is done.
>
>Just curious here, Jim ... do you *know* this for a fact? Do you have some inside information that the rest of us don't have? I haven't seen that stated anywhere publicly by UT management (unless I missed a post somewhere).

I don't "know" (that's why I used the term 'quite clear', but here's the reasoning...

KevinG informed the world (accidentally, I know) of certain "transgressions" by myself, using the exact terminologies that rendered messages "sensitive", yet that message remains UNmarked as "sensitive".

In that same message KevinG informed the world that I had revised my message but 'not before it had been tagged'. There's really only one way for him to know that - to have been aware that someone has informed UT management and obtained a 'favorable' decision. KevinG happened to know that I had been "tagged" even before I was informed of such tagging.

What else can anyone conclude???

Ideas?

>
>~~Bonnie