And another thing. I just reread his latest email to me - which I won't quote because I do not have permission to do so - and there is a paragraph that actually sounds threatening. Like if I don't make things better it really wouldn't be a good thing. I used totally different words, but that really is what he is saying. Maybe he will give me permission to quote him on that one. I wonder if that was "the warning?" It was pretty ambiquous though, so maybe not.

>Interesting Jay ... makes you wonder *why* he wanted you to post it.
>
>~~Bonnie
>
>
>>Michel reqested that I post the email he sent to me. Here it is:
>>
>>"I remembered we exchanged some emails about this in the past and I would like to verify this again. Is Jay Johengen your real name or your real name is Renoir Vandalet? I don’t remember if the change was in regards to security reason for personal treats that occurred from another member or something similar. But, I remember we changed something in your account at one point which has affected your profile."
>>
>>I would like to say that if Michel had simply searched for either "Renoir Vandalet" or "Jay Johengen" he would have found the answer to his question with no reason to send this to me. He obviously knew both names. He wants me to stop accusing him of unprofessionalism, but I truly believe he was headhunting and looking for a reason to try and exile me. I also believe that the fact that many other people agreed that the whole situation with JVP, sensitivity, rules, and my situation, seems unfair just quieted him down as he knew it would just cause a bigger uproar.
>>
>>Hopefully, putting his quoted text here - his request which I also have in email - won't fullfill his wishes.