>>[snip]
>>>With the great sensitivity around this place right now I'd like to see one more "rule" added to the UT's set of rules. What I think is almost necessary is that anyone who is "offended" by a message ought to be required to declare the offensiveness first
to the writer directly in a response to the particular offensive message.
>>[snip]
>>
>>But that's my point. JVP is no longer able to send a response..
>
>But you missed my point - that JohnP was told the SAME things many times directly where he had clear opportunity to respond (and did).
>As for the new rule I would like to see... JohnP has no opportunity to see the message either, so he cannot lodge a complaint (and my point is the complainer needs to declare himself to the writer FIRST, if only to give the writer a chance to apologize formally).
[snip]
Again, that's what I mean, that's my point. JVP cannot complain anymore to you, the writer.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
