No, I'm not. But didn't she make references in some of her texts to 'facts' and 'laws of nature?'


>>Yes, but your example of the keyboard is more a belief in subjectivism and not objectivism.
>
>True. I don't deny that.
>
>But objectivism is also a belief, as you have stated. Both are beliefs, but objectivism purports to be about facts and deductive reasoning, not beliefs. Subjectivism doesn't make such claims.
>
>If "facts are facts" wouldn't it be a fact that "facts are facts"?
>
>If thats a fact, then we shouldn't need beliefs. But apparently we do.
>
>I think the problem here is I'm not sure what Rand means when she says "fact."
>
>Are you aware of any Rand text that addresses this?