>>Peter wasn't feeding the fire, Michel. He was making a simple suggestion that your input all the time would be a worthwhile endeavor on your part. Of course, it is always up to you what you respond to or not.
>
>It just irritates the community when a thread is hijacked. We prefer that a suggestion or another topic not from the main topic of thread is restarted in a new thread than to shift the current one. One of the etiquettes about creating messages is to rely and keep on the thread topic. We have seen too many times someone posting a new question within the same thread or changing the topic completely. This is a general view of things we have observed here in the last years and that reply made me thing about it.
>
>As for your reference to that suggestion, I remember having seen some related suggestions on some of those messages I have read. For most of them I have seen recently, they were in the middle of some threads which make them extremely difficult to find.

Ok, my apologies. I understood your previous post as regarding the negative side of the discussion and that's why you would rather not respond. I agree about the thread drift issues. I guess UT doesn't break threads away to new ones when they start drifting.