George,

Rather than post a reply to this drivel I thought I'd offer you the option to retract what you say here.

Jim

>>>Put me in your TWIT FILTER, Georgie, to save yourself from the urge to make future stupid comments like this piece of CRAP!
>>>
>>>Jim (who will always answer your crap directly!)
>>
>>This goes to George, too.
>>
>>I consider you both my friends, and I really feel bad seeing you two engaged in this sort of session. It seems you both know which of the other's toes have corns, and somehow can't avoid stepping on them.
>>
>>I wish I could put you together at a table and resolve this. Or you guys can do that by yourselves, just to make my day?
>
>Dragan,
>
>There's one thing that you may not know about me. I never, ever say anything on-line that I wouldn't say to someone F2F. It's part of where I grew up.
>
>I'd also say that I've no "vendetta". If anything, I could say that, I've been the one who's been "blind sided". I won't.
>
>I posted a response to Jim's original response to my post to him. That one, and any response from him, seems to have been sent to Michel's "bit bucket". For the sake of simpility, I'll summarize what I said, hopefully, accurately.
>
>What my problem was with this thread was fairly simple. Jim was complaining about someone's comportment. His complaint has to do with someone else's opinion is misplaced. Each of us has a right to their own opinion. However, Jim has used that phrase (which begins with an "F" and ends with "you") in a response to a technical answer. Did anyone try to get Jim barred from the UT? Not to my knowledge. He's done this not just once, but twice.
>
>I can't help the fact that I think this is hypocrisy. In my original response, I quoted Voltaire, who said, "I may disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." I've no problem with Jim expressing his opinions. I do have a problem with anyone that indulges in the level of hypocrisy that he has.