Hi Jim,
Thanks for reading, and apparently approving the main concept. See also my comment hereunder.
>Hi Peter,
>
>I'll offer a general reaction only...
>
>For myself I particularly like the concept of "exclusion" from the thread, (UT) forum or the UT in full.
>I also like the concept of read-only access for members excluded from a forum specifically or the UT in general.
>
>While your proposal looks quite elaborate, I do think that this may constituite the "next level" of trouble handling for moderated forums. It may represent quite a bit of work for the UT ownership, but their doing it would surely become the "leading edge" in the handling of this kind of issue.
If it really causes a lot of work for the moderator(s), then it needs adjustments. But I think that it might also cause less work than the current practice, since there is no longer a need for the moderator to read along with all potentially sensitive messages.
'Leading edge' would mean exposure in magazines?!
>I am not a big fan of anonymous complaining but I guess it must be there.
>
>Jim
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
