Hi
I've seen this in a Firebird news site, a n-tier framework for Python
http://dabodev.com/

>>I've seen conversations on a number of Blogs concerning the advantages of 'static' (C, C+, C#) and 'dynamic' (Smalltalk, Python, Ruby...) languages.
>>Where does VFP fall in this discussion?
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>I'm a long-time foxpro user (back to 1987) that has moved his skillset to perl (this language is a joke) python (this thing is a miracle).
>
>So my answers mostly relate to python, which is typically behing a lost of discussion on "static vs dynamic" in academic circles.
>
>YES, technically VFP falls into the "dynamic" category along with quite a few other languages.
>
>NO, academically, it will never belong to this list of languages referred as "dynamic" by academic circles (from smalltalk to python) because it is both highly specialised and proprietary.
>
>In short, if you practice vfp ... you will feel right at home in python (ruby is a different species) which is both a "dynamic" and "typed" language and may find smalltalk attractive (but possibly not usefull). Of course python is generic (no cursor no Rep-writer no data-aware components, not even a unique UI).
>
>But from a cultural PoV, it makes some sense to move from VFP to python. At least as much as moving from VFP to C (even made sharp).
>
>Now for a very personal standpoint...
>
>SET RANT ON
>
>Come on Guys. I do not want to go the C# route for business apps. We're in 2004! This looks like a bad joke. Dynamic languages are so much more productive.
>
>SET RANT OFF
>
>Franck