Ill remind that a next time <g>.
But Jay, you too have posted 'serious' messages. I took time to read most of them and several of your opinions have influenced me, really. You know, I'm quite curious what you think of my proposal. Even a simple, general 'agree/nonsense' reaction would be appreciated.

>It's easier and quicker to respond to a joke than a seriously involved proposal. Just human nature. Doesn't minimalize your efforts, but maybe if you added some witty remarks in-between each bullet point you would get more response... <g>
>
>>Yes, I do realize that. I also saw your <g>.
>>
>>But you see... it strikes me that the original - and cynical it is - joke gets more attention/reaction than my constructive thread.
>>
>>But I'll no longer react here with: Handling T&C violations Thread #946220 Message #946220 <g>
>>
>>
>>>Peter, you do realize in an ironic (and tongue-in-cheek) way that you could be accused of thread hijacking in order to encourage participation in your other thread... <g>
>>>
>>>>Hi Jay,
>>>>
>>>>Sure, it was a joke and as I now understand you'll take the time to cross-post it in other forums. You have also been quite active in the chatter forum these days. How about reacting to one more chat over there? Handling T&C violations Thread #946220 Message #946220
>>>>
>>>>>Peter, it was a joke. And a rather funny one at that. I think I need to cross-post it in a bunch of other forums... <s>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Nice, but also quite cynical, imo.
>>>>>>How about some constructive comments, Terry?! Handling T&C violations Thread #946220 Message #946220
>>>>>>
>>><snip>