>Peter,
>
>But you see... it strikes me that the original - and cynical it is - joke gets more attention/reaction than my constructive thread.
>
>Have you considered the lack of response to your "constructive thread" as an indicator?
>
>I, for one, don't need any extra rules or policing of the UT. Bad language or conduct doesn't bother me. I have the Thread and Twit filters at my disposal. I have Search capabilities if I really think I have missed something. I don't need or want another Big Brother, thanks.
>
>And quite frankly, there is just to much there to swallow without a lot of study, which I imagine not a lot of others have. The followups you have received, with the excessive quoting, have made the thread near unreadable. You might try a more bite size approach...

Jim;

I did not want to get involved with the “change the UT” concepts. In fact the various activities of the last two weeks or so are making me sick!

I am with you Jim! This is not a democracy but it behaves like one at times. A true democracy equates to chaos. There is no one voice to represent one side or the other. We are dealing with a business and its rules. If we get to vote on all of this make my vote for not changing anything!

We each have responsibility for our actions. If we do not “play by the rules”, we then enjoy the consequences. The UT kitty litter box should be changed and then we can all get on with life!

If someone has a vision of how a forum should be run then they should pursue it by creating his/her own environment.

Sorry to vent but I am about to explode! :)

Tom