I was serious in that someone reading the message **could** conclude that 'Jay doesn't like it so there's one more in favour of hardened rules'. This reply by you clarifies that you are a 'live and let die' kinda guy.

Basically I very much am too UNTIL it gets to be excessive in some specific way (a la constant repetition, often through thread-hijacking, of a theme that denigrates virtually all attendees of this forum).

Thanks for clarifying.

cheers

>Never sure if your dead serious or tongue-in-cheek Jim, but if your serious I meant it as I'm in agreement. Live and let die as far as language/conduct. Rules? Arrogance? Elitism? Lack of fairness? Now that is entirely a different story.
>
>>JimL says "Bad language or conduct doesn't bother me" and you reply "I'm with you on the language and conduct. Don't like it, don't read it.".
>>Just curious how your not liking/reading it measures up to JimL's doesn't bother him?