>Peter,
>
>
But you see... it strikes me that the original - and cynical it is - joke gets more attention/reaction than my constructive thread.>
>Have you considered the lack of response to your "constructive thread" as an indicator?
Not yet. I thought it's still too early to consider reasons.
Why did you put "constructive thread" within quotes?
>I, for one, don't need any extra rules or policing of the UT. Bad language or conduct doesn't bother me. I have the Thread and Twit filters at my disposal. I have Search capabilities if I really think I have missed something. I don't need or want another Big Brother, thanks.
So you could reply with 'nonsense' on top or in place, I guess.
Why use a twit filter if bad language doesn't bother you?
>And quite frankly, there is just to much there to swallow without a lot of study, which I imagine not a lot of others have. The followups you have received, with the excessive quoting, have made the thread near unreadable. You might try a more bite size approach...
Read it as a functional specification. I assume that most of your customers have less clear specs and that you have developed a special capability to read those.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
