>That reply merits a "BRAVO!"??????

To me, yes. To you, obviously not.

>Aside from the fact that an insult and fallacious statements should never garner a "bravo", your standards for such an accolade sure are very very low.

Didn't see it as an insult. Seemed like the facts as I also understand them by reading historical threads from Walter. Lots of opinions, not a lot of facts or practical experience, and he doesn't seem to know the differnce between the two with regards to the subject matter.

Not low standards, but rather a high level of agreement.