>>>>Very well, please provide the data details you think we should have with the available choices.
>>>
>>>PMFJI, for VFP forum I would like at last two pieces of info:
>>>
>>>1. VFP version and Service Pack
>>>2. Windows version and service pack
>>>
>>>It should eliminate a lot of the follow up questions.
>>
>>Hi Sergey, I think these are valid requests. Also, given that most of us (I guess) use only one machine for 99% of our development, would it be better to have this information entered once in the User Profile, with the option to override when starting a new thread?

>Hi censored,
>
>I think that as many, if not more, problem questions arise regarding user site difficulties as local development. I'd say that defaults of any kind **could** be misleading (if the submitter forgets to change them).
>
>Also, don't you think that NETWORK factors are often relevant too?
>
>A convicted obscenist

Dear Obscene,

Tongue in cheek: I think Michel should give us all a utility that notes versions of all installed software (Office Version etc.), then scans our hardware, determines disk numbers, types, capacities, CPU and memory details, network bandwidth and also at various times of the day the network latency and typical machine load – this utility should be able to run in the context of the local workstation or on a server (Windows, Linux and Apple). On the server it would also record metrics relating to User load. On the UT this data would appear in a tool tip text when the mouse hovers over our User names. PUTM’s could get optional extras like shoulder rubs etc.