>I have to copy and post it? You can't read the obvious? Fist into the president's face? He's an imbecile? These are political attacks and I resent them. If it's not against the rules, then the rules need to be re-defined.

So basically you are telling us that in the first instance a colourful metaphor and in the second instance the truth constitutes a political attack. Lets face it I could continue to tell the truth in examining another exchange between Kerry and Bush in the final debate – namely the statement by Kerry that Bush (and I paraphrase) “did not know where Usama Bin Laden was, did not spend time thinking much about him and did not consider him” – Bush stated on record that he said no such thing and yet I heard it with my own ears just yesterday on the radio. So lets add liar to Bush’s list of fundamental flaws. You call it a political attack I call it the truth. Lets face it the bile rising to your throat has such a bad taste, that rather than address the inescapable conclusion you choose to take offence and latch onto my colourful speech.

And just for the record I did not say “Fist into the president's face” I said “performing an introduction between the Presidential jaw and a very tightly clenched fist” it’s a metaphor, get over it! For the record I also resent your mischaracterization of my metaphor and general inability to stay on topic.