>Peter,
>Your prior effort to 'adjust' the rules of conduct suggest that you have a stronger inclination than most to have a vanilla flavoured place.
>
>As a member you have an 'authority' (I called it vested as by right of membership) to "call" someone on the contents of their messages. By "call" I mean inform thread management of your 'hurt'.
>
>If you truly are 'hurt' by the words Houston used then I'd have to say bye to you in the Chatter forum. See you in the VFP forum.
Jeez' Jim... What are you doing! First, I do NOT try to 'adjust' the rules. I now think YOU are trying to do that. Read the T&C. It clearly says: NO POLITICAL ATTACKS.
And I am NOT HURT. Why should I be. I was not called an imbecile, and even then I would not feel hurt! I would probably think "that person is an imbecile himself".
What I am trying to make clear is that if one person gets the right to use such words, then all persons here will implicitly be granted that right. And in that case, I'm out of here indeed. So, I'll await the FURTHER reaction of Houston (because I replied to the first reaction and have not had a reply on that one back) and, if it's not satisfactory, then I'll send a complaint to the moderator and the moderator's reaction will be decisive.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
