>>Fabio,
>>
>>What exactly bug is? Can you describe it? Why do you expect "a fixed 1.00 ratio" ? Is it covered somewhere in VFP docs? It would be also helpfull if your trim repro code of irrelevant stuff.
>>
>>>Bug/Issue : 1 of 22
>>>
>>>This is present on VFP6-7-8-9
>>>
>>>Expected results : a fixed 1.00 ratio
>>>
>>>Repro code:
>><snip>
>
>Sergey,
>no bug of programming, this show that the VFP algorithm is inefficient.
>A simple one exists workaround in order
>to resolve the thing and give always 1.00.

Fabio,

So far you didn't show anything becides posting a bunch of code that does something you cannot explain. And why do you call it a bug if by your admition it's not a bug?