Yes it's a weird behavior I don't understand too. I didn't test if another band of value might react the same way, I'll check that.

>You're right
>
>I wonder what's significant about this value band, except that 64 is, of course that magic binary, hex number. But what about 81?
>
>>Hi guys,
>>
>>I got a good one for you. I've tried this in fox 7, 8 and also 9 beta. Simple way to reproduce the problem:
>>
>>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>?ROUND(63.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>
>>Why do I get 64,22 for the first one and 63.23 for the second one ? The round value doesn't seem to be right between 64 and 81. I tried this :
>>
>>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>to
>>?ROUND(81.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>
>>and the round isn't right !!
>>
>>Somebody and notice this problem ?
>>
>>Note : ?ROUND(ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,10),2)is working well, strange isn't it :)