For Novell I would break it down to:

2.x
3.x
4.x
5.x
6.x

Now on a personal note. I really find a lot of humour when I read posts anywhere where the users complain of using windows operating systems with Novell version 2.x They typically tend to complain about the lack of a gui interface. It really demonstrates ignorance because the difference between the Novell 2.x version and the 4.x version is similar to the difference between DOS 5.0 and Windows 98.

>... for inclusion in the new UT feature to provide more info in a more standard way when bugs/problems are the subject of the thread.
>
>Networking can be a significant factor in diagnosing problems. the following is a START - please add new valid ones - for the dropdown list that UT might include in the feature:
>- Windows 2000 Server
>- Windows 2003 Server
>- Windows NT
>- Novell (need different legitimate versions)
>- SAMBA Server
>- Windows XP
>- Windows 2000 Pro
>- Windows ME
>- Windows 98
>
>Also, possibly a radio button group offering:
>
>(1) No network (2) peer-to-peer (3) proper network
>
>Your assistance, please.
>
>Thanks