Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Job Market Southern California
Message
 
À
19/10/2004 12:56:19
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00952285
Message ID:
00952891
Vues:
17
>Tracy,
>
>> I will never agree with any international court having jurisdiction over an american citizen before the U.S. courts.
>
>While I think the tendency to stand up for every of your citizens [Iran embassy comes to mind] is applaudable and to be preferred to giving in to terrorists [buying out from africa of german tourists a few months back], I think this is formulated too extreme or encompassing.
>
>What about acts of US citizens abroad ? Why should every [act even if not commited in the US] be judged by US standards ? I realize you spoke about "international courts" probably talking about Den Haag, but why shouldn't a US citizen caught with dope in turkey be judged by that countries harsher sentences for that particular crime, to give a slightly off base argument ?
>Any reason to put US standards always first ?
>Sounds a bit arrogant to me ;-)
>
>regards
>
>thomas

A US Citizen or a citizen of any country in Turkey would be tried under Turkish laws, the Haig wouldn't even enter into it.....
Greg Foote
Software At Work, Inc.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform