I use VFP 8 with NAV 2003 (v09.05.15) and have no problems that I can attribute to NAV. However, I do hear people blame NAV for things on occasion. Can you be more specific or point me to documented issues?

Thanks,

Russell Campbell

>Alessio,
>
>You can not trust a computer in computing. Thats normal. This was the very first I ever learned about computing. It needs always a human brain to make sense out of it.
>The simplest reason is translating a decimal fraction into a binary one is imposiible, so a simple 0.1 is not that easy because a binary fraction as divided by 2 and 0.1 is 1/(2*5). This wil end up in 0b0.0001011111111111111111.....
>There was allways a need for look over the results. A number like 1,000,000.01 makes no sense in technical terms, it need to be rounded. In finance terms there might be a reason, but this why we have special data-types for that.
>
>What I see is that you prevent NAV from scanning your scx files.
><bg>
>This is impossibile. NAV will allways scan your files - it will simple surpress the messages for the excluded.
>
>If you run VFP , switch off antvir progs - thats the simple rule. Argue to MS if you don't like it.
>You will run in a lot of strange errors if don't follow it. For example a simple USE may fail.
>
>I run VCX based classes for 7 years know (VFP 5 - 8) and had never had any problem.
>
>Agnes