In response to your last few posts:

There has never been any proof that Iraq had biological weps. He may have
had the desire, but thats it.

And yes, Iraq at one time had a nuclear program But we're talking about
NOW, not before Isreal destroyed it.

I served in the first Gulf war, and I saw the technology of this supposed
dangerous military. They were shooting at us with WWII anti-aircraft guns
and 1970's era russian equipment. They were at that time no real threat to
us. Which is why we rolled right over them.

Then, after 12 years of sactions and US overflights, on again - off again
inspections, you think Iraq had some secret WMD program that no one ever
saw, can't be found now, but is still a threat?? Get real.

All I say is, before you go off and destroy a country based on some supposed
threat, show us the weapons, and prove they are pointed this way.

Bush did neither.




>>The Weapons the US was concerned with are Nukes.
>>
>>The US went to war against Iraq on the incorrect presumption
>>that Iraq had a nuclear program.
>
>Once again, you are so wrong it is almost not worth refuting. Saddam did once have a nuclear program - he even had a reactor - sold to him by Chirac.
>
>There is absolutely no doubt that once the sanctions were lifted he would buy a nuke.
>
>But the concern was with stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons that were never accounted for - and are not to this day.