>>Hello back at you, didn't you read the post I made earlier? The latest study confirms there were and are wmds in Iraq. It also says they only physically checked a fraction of the known sites.
>
>
>You care to show a site where they support this conclusion (about that there are wmd in iraq currently and not too recent past)? I sure havn't heard about that.
>
>Also your statment that only a fraction of known sites have been searched is untrue - all known (where the American government thought wmd to be) have been search and none were found.
>
>
>
You know, I posted the link to the Duelfer report which says they only checked a fraction of a fraction. Here it is AGAIN:
http://www.foia.cia.gov/duelfer/Iraqs_WMD_Vol3.pdfFrom page 34:
• ISG technical experts fully evaluated less than one
quarter of one percent of the over 10,000 weapons
caches throughout Iraq, and visited fewer than ten
ammunition depots identifi ed prior to OIF as sus-pect
CW sites.
Read the report and you will see there were, and most likely, there are wmds there.
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright