Before you start telling me what to read or watch, let me tell you that I only cited CNN for it was what I was watching in that moment, but I read similar things in different places, even international newspapers that I read everyday. So, in your opinion, what I read/hear is wrong, but your sources are always correct, right? Give me a break. For what is worth, even if either one is right and the other is wrong, is a long shot (a cheap one indeed) to call it fiasco, showing that evidently YOU jumped to conclusions even after you acknowleged the case is still being investigated.



>>Why you keep calling it a fiasco? I am watching CNN, and what most people said, including a General that inspected the site, is contradicting Bush claims, not Kerry's
>
>
>Hmm, try watching a different news source, or reading something else. Fox News is reporting that the case is still being investigated and that it is still not known when the weapons were moved, but the embedded reporters are saying they weren't there when the 101st(or whatever division) AD moved in at the start of the war. Some people are jumping to conclusions just so they can use it for political gain instead of waiting for the report.
>
>John