Nah it doesn't, just goes to prove that in some instances the presence of common sense can't be assumed.

In actuality the court reduced her settlement from 2.9 million to 640,000 and McDonald's was in fact partially to blame. Just thought is was a funny analogy.

>Doesn't prove it was right.
>
>>Remember some lady got a million+ dollars from McDonalds because of that...
>>
>>>Should the cup of coffee say caution it's hot?
>>>
>>>>Me and my lateral thinking:
>>>>
>>>>At the end of SF movies and TV shows, esp. in the far future, like Star Trek, there's always the disclaimer that all characters are fictitious and bear no relation to anybody living or dead. Well Du-uh! Is the disclaimer necessary or are people living today going to sue for portraying one of their distant descendants, in the future, in a bad light?
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm.
>>>>
>>>>>You show me any car manual that tells you not to jump it over your house and I'll agree that you've found a bug. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's exactly the kind of thing I worry about when someone says something is a bug. If I go to my car dealer and say, the ride is really terrible. The car shakes violently and bounces around. The mechanic will assume there's something wrong with the suspension.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If I then tell him it's because I'm taking my car off-road onto mountain trails, is that a bug with the suspension?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Shouldn't your car manual worry you about consequences?