>Aren't You jumping to conclusions? By judging what Kerry is doing as "fiasco", You already judged him wrong, and by extension You assumed that Bush is right, but funny enough, You agree that the whole thing is still under investigation, so in theory it is possible that Kerry's allegations are true, for the fiasco is Bush's (and Your's).>

How do I get my thoughts over to you so that you can understand? Hmmm, I'll try again. . . Kerry is saying blah blah blah based on news stories that are premature. That is a fact. I am saying he has stepped in it because of that. Bush is saying we're investigating, but it appears the weapons were already moved. I'm saying that sounds right, but let's wait and see. Kerry jumped the gun and that is a stupid move on his part.


>By the way, did I disrespect You in my messages? I do not think so, and if I did please let me know where and accept my appologies, but, all I get from you are slant insults as response.

Sorry, if you feel insulted. I didn't intend to offend. It just seems you are ignoring the facts so you can give me the liberal talking points.

John