It's interesting how people will quote sources and never actually read them. I think it's apropos when those same sources can be used to discredit their key arguments.

>Yeah, I read it and noted that they had only searched a fraction of a fraction of the weapons repositories.
>from page 40 of volume 3:
>
>"Investigating Captured Enemy Ammunition Points
>(CEA Consolidation Points)
>ISG capitalized on efforts by Coalition Forces in
>December 2003 to begin a program to consolidate
>captured Iraqi weapons into seven pre-identifi ed
>Captured Enemy Ammunition (CEA) Depots (see
>Figure 7). As of mid-September 2004, Coalition
>Forces have reviewed and cleared a total of 10,033
>weapons caches dispersed throughout the country,
>destroying a total of 243,045 tons of munitions. This
>represents only part of Iraq’s pre-OIF munitions
>inventory, and only a fraction of these were checked
>by ISG technical experts for signs of chemical agent
>fi ll. (See Annex H.) "