>Relax, John, I was agreeing with you.
>
>>Hmm, so what does the blurb about only checking a fraction of the arms mean to you? As for using the same source to discredit something, there's nothing unique about that. As slick willie said, "it depends on what the meaning of IS is."


WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY AGREEING WITH ME, THIS IS A FORUM FOR POINT AND COUNTERPOINT!<vbg>