Sorry John, I don't. I don't know if you've been following what I've written, but I 100% believe that plans to attack Iraq were drawn up in the early 90s. They were mothballed until the neocons could find the proper time to unlock the drawer and pull them out again.

You keep mentioning history. Do some studying, some research. How many times have we heard from multiple sources, that the topic of Iraq was discussed on 9/12?

I like to think I'm keeping an open mind and evaluating with an open mind. I think you are essence of what is going to make this election as ugly as its going to be. Bush, probably thru Rove, has discovered he can build himself a nice sized political base by becoming the war president. He has obviously succeeded with you.

This world is a big playground though. And we must play within the rules. As it is we will be paying for the budget deficits incurred by the current administration long after they are gone from power. If he was to win another term, along with the very high probability that several Supreme Court justices will need to be appointed during the next 4 years, I don't know if the USA will EVER recover.

>>Inside the Defense Department, about this time Wolfowitz, Feith and others are kind of pinning the tail on Saddam. They continue to argue for, plan for, hope for Saddam, Saddam, Saddam. Did you know?
>>
>Don't you think the combined intelligence of most of the major players in the world saying that Saddam had wmds had a "LITTLE" to do with our attacking Iraq? Even Kerry said he believed it. Democrats conviently forget that little tidbit, or else try to change the subject whenever that issue is raised.