>>No, I think he changed his mind and decided to go along with the program. A flip flop is like when Kerry SAYS he said one thing, then says another. Bush was clear on the first issue (against) then clear when he changed his mind and went with the commission. Kerry denies having denied anything, therein lies the difference.
>
>http://factcheck.org/article271.html
>
>And Bush overstated matters when he said "My administration worked with the congress to create the department of homeland security." In fact, Bush opposed creation of the separate department for nearly nine months before turning around and supporting it.
>
>Right.

Well, they did oppose it at first, but finally did go along with it and worked to make it happen including selecting the director. That's the point, he never denied that he was against it, but once he was convinced it would be a good thing, they got on board. Kerry doesn't operate that way, he says he didn't say things that he said, or just outright lies. Here's another example from your url above:

The New York Post noted that Kerry was mistaken when he said "they had to close the subway in New York when the Republican Convention was there," blaming Bush for not supplying money to fix tunnels and bridges. Actually, New York subways continued to run during the convention. "We did not stop any trains," said Transit Authority spokesman Paul Fleuranges. "I will not guess or opine what he (Kerry) was talking about."

Go figure?