>No, it's an obvious attempt by you to distort what he said by taking it out of context. He had more to say on that issue. He said he wasn't that concerned about him because there were forces already working to capture/kill him and he felt confident it would happen. He was trying to assure the public that the government was doing everything possible to get the terrorists, but they shouldn't be in a panic over it.

Ah, that's some great spin there.

>>Bush said he has increased spending on curbing nuclear proliferation by "about 35 percent" since he took office. But The Washington Post reported Oct. 1 that Bush proposed a 13 percent cut in his first budget as President -- about $116 million. Much of the increases since then have been added by Congress, the Post reported.
>>
>His first budget was one thing, all four years budgets is another.

And you have some links to show that Bush increased spending on curbing nuclear proliferation by "about 35 percent"?

I noticed you didn't respond to my other two cases of Bush flip-flopping and/or lying. But I do think I see the standard being applied: When my guy does it, it's ok. When the other guy does it, it's just wrong.