John,

There is not much fact to draw conclusions on. A test made 35 years ago does not hold much fact as of the current state.

The whole problem here is extolling every minor single statement from both sides into something either totally blown out of context, or not true at all. There is no way, any american could learn anything from this campain other than they have to dig into actual fact and draw their own conclusions.

Walter,


>Gee, don't you wish Kerry had the higher IQ? I mean even if it was by the slimmest margin, the liberals would be extolling his intelligence. Your attempt to undo the reality isn't working and only shows that like most liberals you want to ignore the facts and twist them to the benefit of thee liberal candidate.
>
>John
>
>>Mid 120's and 120 ? Any significance here ? first of all these test were done a long, long time ago, before george got addicted to alcohol and drugs.
>>
>>It is very ignorant to think that a difference of about 5 points in one test is significant enough to say anything about the difference in intelligence. There is no way you can determine the real IQ with an accuracy of about 10 points in one test. Not even discussing the value of an 35 year old IQ test aimed at the military.
>>
>>Then lets see what they did with their lives after those tests. Kerry went into politics right after that, while bush spend about 20 years in drugs and alcohol. Get the picture??
>>
>>John, it is clear, you only read what you want to read. Making an argument on something that is no argument at all.
>>
>>Besides that, an IQ of 120-130 is not something I would say is very impressive for any president. Even the 38 year old cleaning lady who cleans my house once a week scores a 126. So could I tell here she is more intelligent than the upcomming President of America?
>>
>>Walter,