>>Wrong again - the US withdrew them to create that image in sheeples.
>>http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9811/11/iraq.02/
>
>Wasn't Clinton the president in the 90's. So it's Clinton fault.... I see now.
Sure - and no ones saying it was right. I admit a CLinton Mistake - Can you admit a Dubya mistake?

Liberals never like or worship their choices - they have to work with what this corrupt system throws at em. Repugs worship their choice - Demos are reluctantly resigned to it.

Look at it this way: the elite NYC Dems want Kerry to loose so Hilary - a mail clerk for Brooklyn's elite - can run against whoever the Repugs throw up next cycle. If Kerry looses, we just might have a Hilary next time - is that what you want?

But - in the previous post you exaulted everyone knew that Iraq had them - and I gave you a Washington Post links that detailed Duby's daddy and Rumsfeld and Cheney sold them to him. SO OF COURSE THEY KNEW - the question is Why didn't you?

Iraq did have them until the end of GW1

According to Dueffler (a replican Arms inspector) - he lost those weapons EG DID NOT HAVE THEM after gulf war one/ Gulf War I started when Dubya's dad's ambassador gave Saddam the wink to invade Kuwait. That was the only war we ever made a profit on. Lots of money and Saddam was the Sucker and Dubya's dad ended up with the gold in his Pocket

>>
>>It's about money - and it's fueled by xenophonia and rascism - had nothing to do with WMDs and everything to do with oil.
>
>Ok. It's always about rascism and oil to you guys on the left.
>
Why else would we kill 100000 INNOCENT IRAQIS when they had no WMD and no connection to 911. Give me a reason I understand because the ones we heard were lies!

What is our invasion in Iraq about?

PS: Was your liberal friend cute? Liberal women are really hot - aren't they?:-)