>James,
>>
>>After Bush has won, several news organizations recounted all the Florida ballots and they found that Bush still won. So I still don't see how the election was stolen.
>
>The point is that the Supreme Court stopped the recount after the Florida Supreme Court had approved it. The point is that the Florida Secretary of State did everything she could to stop the recount.
>
>Now, while the U.S. Supreme Court was correct by the letter of the law, they were incorrect by the spirit.
>
>I won't argue about the point about the election "being stolen". I will, however, argue the point that we, to this day, don't really know whether or not the outcome was correct.
>

Yes we do. After every recount, Bush still was the winner.

How many times do we have to recount???????????

Tommy

>>>>Yes, that's certainly a possibility. I hope that doesn't happen, no matter who wins, but especially if Bush wins. It will be another 4 years of hearing that Bush stole the election, when he didn't.
>>>
>>>Chris,
>>>
>>>Shortly after the election in 2000, I was sitting in a bar at Chicago's O'Hare Airport watching the news about the election. There was someone sitting next to me, who happened to be from Buffalo, NY.
>>>
>>>The "talking head" was talking about the possible re-count in Florida. To myself, I said, "I don't care who wins, just as long as they get it right." The man sitting next to me said, "I agree."
>>>
>>>The problem is that we don't know if they got "...it right". I don't know if the election was "stolen" and neither does anyone else. That's the problem.