Yes, I think it should be reset from the timestamp of the last refresh. That makes sense to me.

~~Bonnie




>>Hmmm ... that's not good. I've missed a lot of messages and didn't even realize it until this morning. I would think that when the refresh is done, you know which messages are being brought down and it would be only those messages that should be marked "read" (or however you mark them). Of course, I don't have a clue how you're doing this, so it sounds easy enough to me, but maybe not quite so easy on your end. <g>
>
>Ok, I thought you wanted to have a flag back in time up to several refreshes but no reset on a specific set of new messages which kept growing between refreshes.
>
>In this case, yes, there is a good way to make sure that a reset is done from the timestamp of the refresh and not the timestamp of the actual time.