Not sure whose side these guys are on:

http://pao.hood.army.mil/1CD_2-5Cav/images/Deployment%20pics/Camel%20Spiders.jpg


>>Well, you know we took our foot off your collective neck way back in the 1700s.<g> Actually, England has been our closest ally since WWI. Why can't y'all do something with the French "girlie men?"
>>
>
>Funny you should lump those 2 sentences together because, despite the fact the UK troops had to march hundreds of miles for each engagement with the colonists, we were still kicking your asses. It's only cos the "Surrender Monkeys" (sic) came to your aid with their navy that you won. Then they gave you a nice present in Lady Liberty to commemorate their chicanery.
>
>Further more, after the Napoleonic wars, when we took Canada off the French, we also got, as I understand it, the vast majority of the continent that the French had owned. You only won the 13 original Anglo-Saxon states. Then we ended up giving you the rest of the land later on. But you guys will know your history better than I. I was intrigued to hear of the Battle of Niagara, where US and Canadian troops fought (the C's won!). I suppose that's battle was to decide who got the better part of the Falls! :-)
>>
>>>>>I heard about a new 30,000 pound bomb that could be used soon. Of course, we've got those nuke thingies that would be much more efficient. One bomb, and we don't have any troops on the grounds either. Everyone is back here in the good ole U.S. of A.
>
>Ah, but you'll only have to pay to put back up what yopu knocked down. Lives are much cheaper. No wonder there's no effective government in Iraq - all the Gov. buildings and invfrastructure were destroyed in the war
>
>>
>>On that note, did you hear the little news blurb yesterday. Clinton was telling someone he considered nuking North Korea if they attacked South Korea. Clinton? Nuke? nah, he wouldn't even let the CIA kill ben ladin.
>
>He believed in making love not war. even if he had nuked N Korea he would have said "I did not make war with that country." :-)