That's using your definition of acceptable, but it may not meet the definition of others. Fact is, I know of companies that have turned of WSH on their desktops.

>
>I understand that, Hilmar, and completely disagree with the need and the reasons to turn off WSH. I never heard of anyone even suggesting not to use IIS, or SQL Server, both present a worst security risk than WSH. Oh! and what about ASP.NET? How many times did you hear that it should not be used for it present a serious security risk? Yeah, me neither, the risk is "acceptable" in this case.