>Charles Krauthammer has a brilliant analysis at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44082-2004Nov11.html

Am I right that the conclusion is the "moral values" line is a myth?

So John Harvey heralds the opinion that religious undertones did not decide the election.

Yet John Harvey also posted to my website his opinion that he's unable to accept gay rights. In fact, of the liberal positions he lists as untenable, gay rights is the first, and affirmative action is the only other he lists by name.

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/Techmocracy/browse_frm/thread/60cc2589896d0c2d

Somehow I get the impression that John Harvey is little more than a tool of the establishment.

Ignore him.