You must feel quite the hero setting up strawmen and slaying them. <g>

I simply made the point many of your posts show you are enamored of causes far more complex than you understand and you have no grounding in the cultures or history involved. It really is pretty obvious, Terry. If someone were spouting the same kind of uninformed drivel in a technical area you'd spot it in a second and find it amusing. I'm sure you're a bright guy - the quality of your posts in technical areas point in that direction.

When you call people liars and murderers and racists etc. it implies a certainty that seems misplaced considering the knowledge you're bringing to the table.

>Odd you don't take exception to this in the Arab culture you seem so fascinated by and yet to know so little about.
>
>If you can't make sense of someone - just call em an "arab-lover" or a "n#gger lover" - great tact. But I sense you are trying to justify the murder in Iraq with a new c"con" - the "con" of liberating Arab women from the tyranny of their husbands.
>
>You don't know anything about life: WOMEN ARE IN CHARGE - guidance is not always by force or application of power. Those kinds of "guidance" techniques are the sole precepts of Nazis and our beloved bubba.dubya.
>
>But ggod luck with your thesis. But protecting Arab women from Arab men is not a good defense for war crimes or murder. It just don't cut it!
>
>The the word clitorectomy mean anything to you? They don't do that in Utah. But in Yemen?
>Another position to advocate racial cleansing of Arab men?