Terry.
You're just too smart for me dude.


>No I don't take any theory literally. I'm sure humans have "evolved" over a few thousand year. We'er bigger, stronger, faster and some of us prettier. :)
>
>!!!ALERT!!! Human evolution began about 4 Billion years ago as a DNA slime. Now the family of Man (Homo's) started about 3 million years ago. The Homo sapiens we have become evolved 100,000 to 30,000 years ago. Well before the "great flood" few thousand year you are implying in your statement of understanding above.


Determining age of an object is not the same as proving evolution, is it?


>
>Time can be verified statistically with reverse DNA morhing techniques or Carbon 14 dating. The math behind these facts is evidence not theory.
>http://www.onelife.com/evolve/manev.html
>
>Come - on! Admit it! You're a creationist. We can accept it it. You can hang around with us libertines and bohemians, but never try to pretend that creationism is worthy of rational thought.

Can an agnostic be a creationist?


>
>The theory of evolution ansers all the general questions regarding DNA's timeline. The theology of creationsm is a fairy tale that only serves two purposes:
>1) It makes the believers mind open to other lies. A problem with evengelicals is that they may place their faith ahead of the constitution. Given the vote fraud stories in Ohio, Carolina and FLorida, it would be easy to assume that a church lady at a polling station with paperless machines (and a liitle Access knowledge) could reverse the counts. After all, she would be working in the name of the faith which is taught to be above the "laws of men" (constitution). If you notice, only the votes in paperless precincts was the opposite of exit polls. The exit polls with almost a 100% match at all other voting venues. The accuracy of the exit polls is .00000001!

Now you're loosing me here....

>
>2) Creationism also gives hopes to those who find it distastful to trace there ancestry back to the "dark" central plains of africa. Creationism, in this case, allows for the false notion of "spontaneous human evolution". The faithful vainfully fearing a "dark" ancestory can point tothis theory and clain to have no "dark" blood in their veins. In this instance, creationism serves a racist vanity.
>
>All I'm saying is we just don't know. So, no one sect can claim to have the facts.
>We do know enough about evolution to call it fact. The science of eveolution allows us to convict people of crimes or prove that someone was not involved in a crime. The stats for that are accurate to 1 in a billion!

Ask any evolutionist sicentist about what they know about evolution and they'll tell you in a general terms because they don't know.