>Ok you put that very elegantly. But still no Big Bang, no stars and no evolution. Does it really matter how the particle got here?
>
>And lot of assumptions and "religion" is required to believe all this happened because none of this is possible in a laboratory.
Still, despite its shortcomings, and the fact that some critical details are not explained yet, it is the best explanation we have so far, as to the origin of life. I am not aware of another, better, theory.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
