>>The Miller/Uray experiment was a sham. He used a special trap to make it "work" and got very little result at best. The experiment yeld 80% tar about 17% carboylic Acid and about 3% amino acid (the wrong type). The many aminos acid bonded to the Tar and was destroyed and those that didn't couldn't survive out side the little trap he had contraped.
>
>Also, the evolution theory may be subject to some revisions, but so far, it is the best explanation there is, for the origin of life. There are simply no serious alternative explanations, to the question, how life originated. The theory of evolution will surely be revised, but I think that it is idle to deny the basic idea, namely, that complex life forms evolved from simpler ones.


Yeah. I never said evolution was bad science. There are many good scientists that are working on this issue.

<...complex life forms evolved from simpler ones.

Well if they can tell me how the evolution process over cames some great hurdles, especially at the beginning, it would be more convincing. But currently they just generalize most part of the theory.