Yes! I'm allowed to fantasize, right?

>So, what you're saying is, you want to have it both ways. Announce a specific date and get a stable product out the door. That then looks really bad if a major issue is uncovered that will cause that specific date to slip.
>
>>Well I don't care! I'm impatient! <g> I want VFP 9 to get here and I want it to be stable (i.e. I want certain bugs fixed and for it to be truly stable vs. just "says us" stable). Write your letter, Ken. Give us some good news! Thanks, though . . .
>>