>>I thought it was a dogma.
>
>Only if you're closed minded. ;)
While "dogma" might not be the most accurate term, the Creationist Theories are based more on "the Bible said so" reasoning than on any solid evidence. Therefore, I would consider it more religious than scientific.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
