That's better!

Now if you could tell me what it was that was "clearly and demonstrably false. . ." I can probably respond.

Jim N

>Please reread my message. The message is, in a word, that VFP's commercial frameworks fare far better than conjectural denigration would imply. One would expect that frameworks written in a new environment would be of questionable quality. This is clearly not the case.
>
>Furthermore, in a public forum, when one says something that's clearly and demonstrably false, one should not be surprised to be challenged about it. Understood?