Well, yes, I understand. I would guess, however, that the percentage of MVPs that are PUTMs is higher than the percentage of VFP users that are PUTMs, so just "playing the numbers", I was a little surprised Craig wasn't an MVP.

NOTE: VFP 9 Dec. 15 release date?

http://blogs.msdn.com/acoat/



>>Too bad for the MVPs. But actually when I said "by default" I didn't mean an automatic PUTM subscription. I just meant I figured MVPs might have a strong desire to access the more advanced UT features and would therefore pony up the funds to get a PUTM.
>
>Russell,
>
>Not all of us (including me) are in a financial position to do so.
>
>Speaking only for myself, I'm 56 (57 in February) with a son in college at Athens, GA. Not only do I have his expenses to consider, but my retirement as well.
>
>I used to be a PUTM before I became an MVP. After my son graduated from Cartersville HS, and Michel stopped giving PUTMs to MVPs, it wasn't economically feasible.
>
>Further, consider some of the MVPs from third world countries. The amount of a PUTM maybe out of their reach.